| 13451 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 92.4 #1/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 72.5 #1/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19571 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 80.8 #2/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.6 #2/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18304 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 69.7 #3/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.1 #4/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 1002 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.8 #4/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.5 #7/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12762 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.8 #5/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.0 #6/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15173 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.4 #6/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.9 #5/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9785 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.2 #7/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 61.8 #3/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16600 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.8 #8/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.9 #11/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19987 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.8 #9/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.1 #8/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13245 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.3 #10/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.8 #9/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20172 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.9 #11/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 28.6 #12/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10219 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.8 #12/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.1 #10/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11347 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.6 #13/13 avg 53.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.2 #13/13 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |