| 8672 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 77.0 #1/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 72.0 #2/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8813 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 73.7 #2/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 77.7 #1/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11142 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 67.8 #3/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.5 #3/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7400 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 66.4 #4/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.3 #4/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20097 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 66.0 #5/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.5 #8/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6603 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.4 #6/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.5 #5/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7196 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.2 #7/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.6 #13/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8588 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.4 #8/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.5 #9/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12863 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.3 #9/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.9 #6/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10602 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.4 #10/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.5 #12/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6545 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.8 #11/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.7 #11/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8743 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.9 #12/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 59.2 #7/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20321 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.8 #13/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.8 #21/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15055 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.6 #14/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.9 #10/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10082 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.0 #15/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.6 #15/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4177 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.4 #16/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.3 #14/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5062 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.3 #17/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.1 #17/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20349 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 42.1 #18/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.7 #16/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18482 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.8 #19/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.2 #19/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6072 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.0 #20/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.9 #20/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13532 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.0 #21/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.7 #18/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8696 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.1 #22/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.4 #22/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 367 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.8 #23/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.4 #23/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18878 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.0 #24/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.6 #25/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11721 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 8.9 #25/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.2 #24/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10139 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.4 #26/26 avg 46.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -4.9 #26/26 avg 43.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |