| 19379 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 73.3 #1/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 74.1 #1/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12868 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.4 #2/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.2 #2/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16457 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.7 #3/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.6 #5/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17335 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.8 #4/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.8 #3/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14683 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.0 #5/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.4 #6/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12679 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.6 #6/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.9 #4/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10093 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.1 #7/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.7 #7/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10420 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.3 #8/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.3 #8/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10421 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 26.0 #9/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.1 #9/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9929 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.6 #10/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.7 #10/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19508 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.9 #11/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.5 #11/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 2923 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.8 #12/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.3 #12/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11382 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.4 #13/13 avg 33.8 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.7 #13/13 avg 33.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |