| 15455 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 101.9 #1/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 90.9 #2/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13377 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 101.1 #2/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 99.9 #1/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3537 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 66.2 #3/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.8 #5/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14954 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.2 #4/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.7 #3/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8578 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 48.9 #5/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 61.6 #4/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8791 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.3 #6/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.1 #6/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8435 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.1 #7/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.4 #8/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10293 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.9 #8/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.7 #7/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11959 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.1 #9/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.2 #9/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13246 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.8 #10/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -2.5 #11/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19864 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.5 #11/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.3 #10/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10455 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.7 #12/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -4.5 #12/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8793 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -27.8 #13/13 avg 38.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -56.9 #13/13 avg 32.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |