| 18555 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 92.9 #1/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 91.2 #1/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17008 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.8 #2/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.1 #4/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18621 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.5 #3/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.1 #2/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18750 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.2 #4/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.4 #3/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14931 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 42.2 #5/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.5 #8/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11117 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.4 #6/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.4 #5/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12660 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.6 #7/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.0 #6/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6708 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.8 #8/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.3 #7/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9459 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.5 #9/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.4 #9/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18748 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.8 #10/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.6 #11/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11270 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.5 #11/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.8 #10/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7281 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.5 #12/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.4 #12/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18749 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.3 #13/13 avg 39.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.4 #13/13 avg 38.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |