| 19668 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 93.2 #1/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 88.9 #1/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4155 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 92.0 #2/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 75.8 #3/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6042 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 91.1 #3/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 81.8 #2/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18274 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.8 #4/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.9 #5/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9898 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.1 #5/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.7 #6/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10355 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.8 #6/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.3 #7/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14906 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.6 #7/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.7 #4/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19901 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.4 #8/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.6 #8/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18574 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.3 #9/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -7.8 #13/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16640 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.7 #10/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.1 #10/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18577 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.7 #11/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.3 #9/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16641 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -4.1 #12/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -6.7 #12/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18575 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -7.1 #13/13 avg 37.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.7 #11/13 avg 34.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
