| 11093 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 95.6 #1/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 79.7 #1/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16556 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 91.8 #2/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 74.8 #2/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11503 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.9 #3/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.9 #5/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13329 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.8 #4/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.5 #7/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4546 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.8 #5/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.5 #3/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20240 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.5 #6/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.5 #4/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19412 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.1 #7/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.2 #6/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12126 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.8 #8/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 1.9 #9/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19632 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.1 #9/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -14.1 #11/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18884 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.7 #10/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -15.0 #12/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17264 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 1.4 #11/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -34.8 #13/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20020 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -4.2 #12/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 3.8 #8/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18886 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -6.5 #13/13 avg 33.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -5.6 #10/13 avg 17.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |