| 12887 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 79.4 #1/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 75.3 #1/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18341 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.8 #2/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 62.3 #2/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15600 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.7 #3/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.0 #3/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17755 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.6 #4/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.0 #5/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21802 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.9 #5/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 51.0 #4/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15909 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.0 #6/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.3 #7/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21678 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.5 #7/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.0 #6/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21091 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.4 #8/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.5 #9/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13531 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 26.7 #9/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.0 #8/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16255 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.8 #10/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.9 #11/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22252 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.9 #11/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.9 #10/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22412 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.3 #12/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.1 #12/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16508 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.5 #13/13 avg 39.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 7.1 #13/13 avg 36.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |