| 22160 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.1 #1/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.5 #2/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 2858 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 65.9 #2/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 59.2 #3/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9206 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.9 #3/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.4 #1/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14778 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.7 #4/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.8 #4/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10158 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.8 #5/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.9 #5/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14682 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.4 #6/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 28.2 #6/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22301 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.8 #7/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.4 #8/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10537 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.1 #8/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.4 #10/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6278 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.0 #9/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.9 #7/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12974 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.5 #10/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.8 #9/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21947 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.6 #11/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.6 #11/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14756 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.7 #12/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.5 #12/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14887 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -8.0 #13/13 avg 34.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -5.5 #13/13 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |