| 14188 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 125.1 #1/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 106.4 #2/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8101 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 110.6 #2/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 108.1 #1/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17127 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 94.7 #3/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 92.6 #3/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13603 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 81.4 #4/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 89.0 #4/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10273 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 78.6 #5/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.7 #7/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18535 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 68.9 #6/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 75.2 #5/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6699 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 65.8 #7/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.5 #6/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20037 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.6 #8/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.8 #8/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18082 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.4 #9/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.7 #15/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10238 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.3 #10/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 51.4 #11/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8962 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.9 #11/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.8 #9/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21606 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.5 #12/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.1 #13/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22239 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.9 #13/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.3 #17/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11270 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.8 #14/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.8 #12/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14779 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.6 #15/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.5 #10/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7290 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 42.6 #16/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.6 #19/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21475 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.9 #17/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.1 #18/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17240 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.9 #18/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.1 #22/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10430 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.7 #19/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.6 #16/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20053 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 26.0 #20/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.6 #20/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7897 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.6 #21/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.1 #24/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12886 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.4 #22/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.6 #14/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20052 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.3 #23/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.6 #25/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18167 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.7 #24/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.1 #23/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20050 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.9 #25/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.9 #21/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20287 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -4.7 #26/26 avg 50.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -8.8 #26/26 avg 47.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |