| 16309 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 104.2 #1/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 90.5 #1/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10127 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 95.1 #2/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 85.3 #2/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13737 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 82.0 #3/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.7 #5/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18463 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 79.1 #4/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.4 #6/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9849 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 78.3 #5/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.0 #7/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3409 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.7 #6/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 77.2 #4/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5227 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 68.3 #7/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 78.9 #3/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9960 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 67.0 #8/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.6 #8/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22093 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.0 #9/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.4 #14/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11102 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.5 #10/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.7 #10/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13399 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.4 #11/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.0 #9/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19815 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.6 #12/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.6 #13/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21858 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 48.9 #13/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.0 #15/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21485 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 48.2 #14/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.9 #12/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7532 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.1 #15/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.3 #17/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13498 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.1 #16/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.9 #23/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15583 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.1 #17/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.6 #20/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21487 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.5 #18/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.6 #18/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18464 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.4 #19/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.4 #16/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8136 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.7 #20/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.2 #11/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12381 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.6 #21/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.3 #24/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15504 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.8 #22/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.1 #22/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18775 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.4 #23/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.6 #19/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13435 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.0 #24/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.2 #21/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20218 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.9 #25/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.8 #25/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21806 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -3.8 #26/26 avg 51.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -6.8 #26/26 avg 46.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |