| 18757 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 67.5 #1/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.0 #1/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13107 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.1 #2/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 59.2 #2/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7026 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.0 #3/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.2 #7/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12636 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.5 #4/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.2 #10/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 207 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.9 #5/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 53.6 #3/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15762 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.7 #6/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.0 #12/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 248 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.0 #7/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.1 #4/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13617 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.3 #8/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.8 #6/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4215 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.2 #9/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.4 #5/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13048 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.5 #10/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.4 #11/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13103 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.7 #11/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.5 #13/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18758 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.2 #12/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.8 #9/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 247 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.0 #13/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.2 #8/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6983 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.3 #14/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.6 #21/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13105 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.7 #15/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.6 #19/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18759 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.6 #16/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.1 #14/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15891 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.7 #17/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.3 #15/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14450 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.9 #18/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.4 #16/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15887 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.0 #19/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.6 #20/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7251 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.4 #20/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.2 #18/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11124 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 21.7 #21/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.8 #25/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18760 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.0 #22/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.1 #17/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 251 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.3 #23/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.1 #23/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3777 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.2 #24/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 2.6 #26/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13970 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.5 #25/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.1 #22/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12309 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.1 #26/26 avg 35.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.2 #24/26 avg 32.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |