| 6272 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.0 #1/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.9 #1/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21816 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.1 #2/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.8 #2/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16555 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.4 #3/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.7 #3/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19452 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.6 #4/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.4 #4/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7161 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.2 #5/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.6 #5/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12126 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.4 #6/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.2 #8/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16556 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.4 #7/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.9 #6/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21927 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.0 #8/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.8 #7/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11918 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.4 #9/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.1 #12/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20737 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.2 #10/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.9 #9/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20736 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.0 #11/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.9 #10/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19412 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.2 #12/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.1 #11/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21504 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.5 #13/13 avg 39.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.3 #13/13 avg 38.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |