| 26025 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 138.3 #1/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 126.6 #1/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20266 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 133.8 #2/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 124.0 #3/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16353 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 133.6 #3/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 125.4 #2/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26908 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 132.8 #4/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 113.4 #5/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22111 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 118.4 #5/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 104.8 #6/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16205 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 117.8 #6/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 103.7 #7/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16448 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 113.6 #7/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 114.6 #4/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22817 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 97.8 #8/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 84.4 #8/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19461 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 83.9 #9/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 75.2 #12/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20025 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 83.5 #10/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 79.5 #10/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24828 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 81.4 #11/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 83.9 #9/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23430 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 78.0 #12/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 77.7 #11/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3491 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 72.6 #13/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.0 #13/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18589 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.8 #14/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.6 #14/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24622 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.1 #15/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 62.5 #15/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18840 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.0 #16/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 60.7 #16/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25748 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.6 #17/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.3 #20/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22648 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.1 #18/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.7 #21/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15639 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.9 #19/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.5 #18/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24232 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.3 #20/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.8 #17/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17453 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.4 #21/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.5 #19/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27154 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.2 #22/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.3 #22/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13459 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.0 #23/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.2 #26/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18841 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.0 #24/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.8 #23/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16031 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.8 #25/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.1 #24/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22263 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.9 #26/26 avg 71.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.2 #25/26 avg 68.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |