| 12529 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 208.8 #1/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 197.7 #1/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20891 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 160.6 #2/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 163.1 #3/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18742 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 156.1 #3/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 172.1 #2/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24697 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 148.7 #4/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 162.2 #4/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6916 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 136.7 #5/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 128.2 #5/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13906 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 108.6 #6/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 79.7 #8/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28378 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 107.3 #7/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 108.6 #6/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28377 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 85.3 #8/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 81.4 #7/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24372 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.9 #9/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 77.5 #9/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17517 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 66.7 #10/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.0 #10/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28380 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 65.7 #11/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.0 #16/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28379 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.6 #12/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.4 #11/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16772 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.2 #13/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.7 #12/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22222 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.4 #14/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.9 #15/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21055 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.8 #15/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.4 #17/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24878 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 42.7 #16/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.8 #20/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21051 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.8 #17/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.0 #22/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21063 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.8 #18/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.9 #18/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24812 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.2 #19/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.5 #21/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21100 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.9 #20/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.2 #24/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24373 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 26.0 #21/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.5 #13/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22933 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.6 #22/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.2 #19/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22883 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.5 #23/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.0 #14/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24497 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.7 #24/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.9 #25/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21105 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 8.1 #25/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.5 #23/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24638 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.6 #26/26 avg 70.0 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.3 #26/26 avg 68.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |