| 26530 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 96.4 #1/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 95.1 #1/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26562 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.3 #2/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 74.6 #2/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3558 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.2 #3/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.2 #7/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26126 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.6 #4/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.4 #3/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23739 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.2 #5/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.3 #5/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11586 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.6 #6/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.3 #12/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10468 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.7 #7/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.9 #4/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14672 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.4 #8/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.0 #8/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26528 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.2 #9/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.3 #11/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25956 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.3 #10/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.5 #6/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24062 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.1 #11/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.6 #14/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23601 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.1 #12/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.2 #9/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26171 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.3 #13/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.2 #13/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11873 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.1 #14/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.5 #10/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27566 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.8 #15/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.9 #15/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7281 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.6 #16/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.5 #16/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6708 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.5 #17/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.4 #19/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18748 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.9 #18/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.0 #18/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21631 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.8 #19/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.8 #20/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26460 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.9 #20/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.3 #17/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18749 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.3 #21/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.7 #26/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21986 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.2 #22/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.2 #22/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18750 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.7 #23/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.8 #25/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26462 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.5 #24/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.0 #23/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26529 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.0 #25/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.4 #21/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9617 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.5 #26/26 avg 39.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.8 #24/26 avg 38.3 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |