| 8803 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 131.4 #1/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 120.3 #1/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23521 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 112.1 #2/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 111.6 #2/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12390 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 106.4 #3/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 86.0 #7/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14627 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 95.8 #4/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 91.1 #4/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8651 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 94.6 #5/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 82.9 #8/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6556 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 90.0 #6/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 90.7 #5/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16489 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 80.2 #7/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 91.6 #3/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11279 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 77.9 #8/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 88.6 #6/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19795 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 76.9 #9/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.9 #9/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23994 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.3 #10/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 69.7 #10/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12272 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 68.4 #11/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 61.4 #13/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23659 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.3 #12/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 61.0 #14/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8772 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.9 #13/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.8 #11/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23628 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.1 #14/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 60.4 #15/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21585 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.2 #15/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.5 #12/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23776 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.2 #16/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.3 #17/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6205 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.8 #17/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.3 #16/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22912 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.4 #18/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.5 #18/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13054 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.8 #19/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.5 #19/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10191 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.4 #20/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.7 #20/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19846 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.5 #21/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.1 #21/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24707 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 21.4 #22/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.2 #24/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22911 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 11.2 #23/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.3 #25/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23394 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.4 #24/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -9.8 #26/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13432 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.8 #25/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.0 #23/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22910 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.0 #26/26 avg 58.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.5 #22/26 avg 57.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |