| 20077 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 100.2 #1/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 87.9 #1/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18139 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 92.6 #2/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 86.7 #2/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8824 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 75.1 #3/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.9 #3/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24122 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.6 #4/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.9 #4/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12959 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.9 #5/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.7 #5/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16754 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.1 #6/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.4 #9/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24121 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.5 #7/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.8 #8/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23814 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.9 #8/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.5 #11/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22131 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.5 #9/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.8 #7/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26842 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.3 #10/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.0 #6/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26661 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.0 #11/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.0 #10/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17111 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 8.1 #12/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.3 #12/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16010 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.7 #13/13 avg 33.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.6 #13/13 avg 33.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |