| 18030 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 163.5 #1/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 147.6 #1/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12928 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 133.3 #2/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 130.5 #2/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26847 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 67.0 #3/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 79.6 #3/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12596 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.8 #4/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.2 #5/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4545 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.8 #5/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.3 #6/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27049 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.8 #6/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.1 #4/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19380 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.0 #7/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.4 #8/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11503 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.6 #8/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.6 #7/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6209 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.6 #9/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.2 #9/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24021 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.8 #10/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.9 #11/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7161 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.7 #11/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.4 #10/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7079 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.2 #12/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.9 #13/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21438 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.2 #13/13 avg 48.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.3 #12/13 avg 48.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |