| 12331 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 138.6 #1/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 132.7 #1/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10949 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 109.3 #2/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.1 #10/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12414 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 101.8 #3/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 99.1 #2/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8397 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.9 #4/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.0 #5/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12011 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.8 #5/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 60.9 #3/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21580 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.3 #6/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.0 #6/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7486 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.1 #7/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.9 #8/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25122 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.7 #8/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -9.3 #25/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12399 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 47.1 #9/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.5 #12/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10870 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.6 #10/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.9 #11/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16700 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.1 #11/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.5 #7/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24595 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.1 #12/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.3 #9/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20805 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.8 #13/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.4 #4/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10475 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.2 #14/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.7 #13/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20228 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.9 #15/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.7 #20/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21378 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.1 #16/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.2 #19/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8490 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.8 #17/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.7 #16/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17022 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.4 #18/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.6 #17/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4654 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.5 #19/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 32.2 #14/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.4 #20/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.1 #15/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11205 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.4 #21/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.3 #18/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6460 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.8 #22/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -0.0 #23/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6567 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.0 #23/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.4 #21/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11995 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.9 #24/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 3.6 #22/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21428 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 9.5 #25/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -2.2 #24/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20203 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -10.2 #26/26 avg 40.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -17.2 #26/26 avg 35.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |