| 21380 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 73.6 #1/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 69.1 #1/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5921 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.5 #2/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.2 #3/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15091 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.3 #3/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.2 #2/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10789 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.3 #4/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.6 #9/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15046 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.8 #5/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.3 #4/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21788 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.2 #6/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.3 #8/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21525 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.5 #7/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.6 #7/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9881 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.8 #8/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.3 #5/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15303 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.4 #9/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.5 #6/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19653 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.3 #10/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.1 #10/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21444 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.0 #11/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.7 #11/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22124 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.0 #12/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.8 #13/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16179 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 11.0 #13/13 avg 35.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.9 #12/13 avg 34.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |