| 7813 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 81.0 #1/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 52.3 #5/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12887 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 75.6 #2/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.8 #1/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7172 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 66.2 #3/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.8 #2/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21330 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.8 #4/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.6 #3/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22743 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.6 #5/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.2 #4/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18341 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.5 #6/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.3 #7/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15909 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.2 #7/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.5 #8/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10092 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.7 #8/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.5 #6/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20334 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.5 #9/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 31.8 #9/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10348 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 26.3 #10/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 28.7 #10/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21797 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.9 #11/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.4 #11/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12275 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 11.6 #12/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.4 #12/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19010 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.0 #13/13 avg 42.6 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.6 #13/13 avg 39.4 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |