| 19164 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 97.2 #1/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 98.8 #1/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24893 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 84.5 #2/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 77.8 #2/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24443 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.1 #3/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.1 #3/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24670 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.4 #4/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.2 #4/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25294 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.2 #5/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.4 #6/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24965 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 47.0 #6/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.5 #5/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24692 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 46.8 #7/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.8 #16/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19162 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.2 #8/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 41.0 #7/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24935 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.3 #9/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.0 #11/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24693 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.4 #10/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.7 #13/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25364 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.6 #11/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.8 #15/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25210 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.6 #12/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.5 #10/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25300 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.0 #13/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.2 #8/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24881 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.1 #14/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.5 #9/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25293 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.8 #15/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.3 #18/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25058 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.4 #16/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 8.1 #22/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22958 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.4 #17/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.7 #17/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25355 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.7 #18/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.9 #21/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21094 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.4 #19/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.8 #26/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22959 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.9 #20/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.6 #14/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24773 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.8 #21/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.2 #12/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25286 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.0 #22/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.1 #20/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25119 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 11.2 #23/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 1.2 #24/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25272 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.9 #24/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.3 #19/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24925 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.9 #25/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 2.9 #23/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25109 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -3.3 #26/26 avg 31.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 0.3 #25/26 avg 27.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |