| 11308 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.0 #1/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.6 #1/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23477 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.6 #2/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.8 #2/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22913 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.3 #3/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.7 #6/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17153 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.7 #4/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.2 #4/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21430 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.9 #5/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.4 #3/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24591 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.8 #6/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 0.4 #11/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17973 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.0 #7/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.2 #9/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23476 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.4 #8/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.2 #5/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17483 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.7 #9/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.0 #7/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23738 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 8.9 #10/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -1.1 #12/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24120 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 0.7 #11/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.0 #8/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24065 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.0 #12/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.8 #10/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24590 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.1 #13/13 avg 26.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -15.9 #13/13 avg 20.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |