| 8468 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 109.9 #1/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 119.0 #1/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23872 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 100.8 #2/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 95.5 #3/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20153 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 92.6 #3/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 104.6 #2/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16011 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 88.7 #4/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 82.8 #5/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21324 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 86.0 #5/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 85.7 #4/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18035 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 85.9 #6/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 78.9 #6/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4149 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 75.1 #7/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.3 #8/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10333 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.3 #8/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.4 #9/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13669 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.9 #9/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.8 #7/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22311 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.5 #10/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.8 #11/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20152 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.9 #11/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 51.5 #10/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14382 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.0 #12/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.7 #18/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10353 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.2 #13/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.9 #12/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20201 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.2 #14/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.2 #13/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20094 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.8 #15/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.3 #21/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16269 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.7 #16/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.6 #20/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11792 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.9 #17/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.5 #16/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7786 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.9 #18/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.6 #14/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21458 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.6 #19/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.9 #15/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21916 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.0 #20/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.1 #19/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4185 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.0 #21/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.7 #17/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8480 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.1 #22/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.8 #23/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16354 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.7 #23/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.5 #24/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24318 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.7 #24/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 8.2 #22/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18603 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.2 #25/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 2.3 #25/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9242 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -13.6 #26/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -14.3 #26/26 avg 41.0 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |