| 19862 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 152.9 #1/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 129.9 #1/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21227 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 139.8 #2/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 129.0 #2/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23641 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 134.9 #3/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 124.5 #3/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14969 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 101.0 #4/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 91.6 #4/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19639 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.0 #5/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.1 #6/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19896 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 62.6 #6/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.5 #8/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23393 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.1 #7/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.9 #9/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18466 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.7 #8/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.3 #5/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5206 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.0 #9/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.0 #10/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20791 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.3 #10/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.2 #15/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 524 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.9 #11/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.1 #12/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23808 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.0 #12/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.8 #7/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19505 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.4 #13/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.9 #19/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23810 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.9 #14/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.2 #13/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16276 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.5 #15/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.6 #14/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13050 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.5 #16/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.1 #21/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 596 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.7 #17/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 3.8 #24/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24944 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.0 #18/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.7 #20/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27497 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.1 #19/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.2 #23/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26419 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.7 #20/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.5 #17/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27869 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.3 #21/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.7 #16/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28251 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.7 #22/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.4 #18/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24411 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.4 #23/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.5 #11/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8404 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.0 #24/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.9 #22/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18715 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 9.0 #25/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 3.6 #25/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27669 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -11.6 #26/26 avg 42.5 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.9 #26/26 avg 40.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |