| 16439 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 160.9 #1/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 143.2 #2/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23928 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 154.9 #2/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 151.0 #1/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 226 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 106.0 #3/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 133.5 #3/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 369 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 105.6 #4/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 85.7 #9/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25865 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 103.3 #5/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 105.9 #7/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27025 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 100.4 #6/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 117.0 #5/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23218 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 100.3 #7/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 117.4 #4/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23975 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 99.2 #8/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 106.0 #6/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16537 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 88.8 #9/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 101.2 #8/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27386 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.6 #10/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 80.3 #10/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24219 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 68.9 #11/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.4 #13/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 293 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.1 #12/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.2 #12/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23669 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.1 #13/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.0 #14/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8095 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.7 #14/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.1 #11/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23741 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.5 #15/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.1 #15/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27814 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.7 #16/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.5 #22/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27255 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 34.9 #17/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.8 #17/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16129 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.4 #18/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 23.0 #18/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27489 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.9 #19/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.1 #20/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7039 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.5 #20/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.5 #16/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15371 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.6 #21/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.6 #19/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25958 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.7 #22/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.1 #21/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21459 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 11.6 #23/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -17.7 #26/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23382 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.2 #24/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -15.9 #25/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27527 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 1.6 #25/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -8.8 #24/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12718 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -7.1 #26/26 avg 60.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -4.1 #23/26 avg 55.9 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |