| 14825 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 140.6 #1/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 139.8 #1/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6962 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 121.7 #2/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 117.9 #2/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23562 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 99.9 #3/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 93.1 #4/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22492 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 96.3 #4/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 98.6 #3/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8898 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.1 #5/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.1 #5/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5159 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.4 #6/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.6 #6/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24425 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.4 #7/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.7 #8/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20311 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.4 #8/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.4 #9/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22517 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.1 #9/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.2 #10/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17445 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.6 #10/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.5 #7/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6175 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 6.6 #11/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -2.4 #12/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23657 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.0 #12/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 7.7 #11/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27495 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -0.2 #13/13 avg 47.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.3 #13/13 avg 45.8 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |