| 23392 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.7 #1/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.0 #1/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14757 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.6 #2/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.5 #2/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17181 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.2 #3/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.2 #3/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23373 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.1 #4/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.9 #5/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14638 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.0 #5/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.1 #4/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18954 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 47.0 #6/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.8 #6/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10016 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.4 #7/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.1 #8/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23952 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.6 #8/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.8 #7/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15471 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.2 #9/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.7 #9/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25819 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.3 #10/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.3 #10/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22918 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.9 #11/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.1 #11/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23590 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.6 #12/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 7.4 #12/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17155 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -0.2 #13/13 avg 40.3 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 7.3 #13/13 avg 40.6 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |