| 21305 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 139.9 #1/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 129.5 #1/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21606 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 81.9 #2/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 73.9 #3/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21567 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 77.5 #3/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.8 #4/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17240 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 76.5 #4/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 62.6 #7/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11206 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 65.8 #5/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 69.1 #5/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22072 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.4 #6/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 74.4 #2/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4509 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.8 #7/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.6 #11/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11413 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.0 #8/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.4 #6/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23531 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.4 #9/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 47.5 #8/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13247 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 48.8 #10/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.7 #13/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11412 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.9 #11/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.3 #12/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22239 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 43.7 #12/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.2 #9/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7896 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.1 #13/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.8 #10/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27328 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.1 #14/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.3 #15/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20050 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.0 #15/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.7 #18/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26435 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.7 #16/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.5 #19/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27124 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.3 #17/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.4 #20/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7588 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.5 #18/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 33.5 #14/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12649 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.5 #19/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 30.8 #16/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22074 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.4 #20/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.3 #23/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20054 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.8 #21/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.4 #17/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11270 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.2 #22/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.7 #22/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27327 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.1 #23/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.6 #25/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7897 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 9.8 #24/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -0.6 #26/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17017 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.6 #25/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.8 #21/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27799 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -5.1 #26/26 avg 43.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.9 #24/26 avg 41.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |