| 7149 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 169.5 #1/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 177.0 #1/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9848 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 95.6 #2/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 98.5 #2/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20205 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 86.5 #3/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 89.6 #3/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17036 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.9 #4/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 87.1 #4/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20204 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 72.7 #5/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.6 #6/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9533 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 61.5 #6/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.0 #8/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18241 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.3 #7/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 53.4 #9/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5387 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 58.5 #8/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 73.9 #5/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13583 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.9 #9/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 54.2 #7/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12441 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 54.6 #10/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.9 #12/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16740 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 47.2 #11/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 31.0 #15/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24125 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.7 #12/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.0 #13/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27599 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.8 #13/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.0 #18/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17377 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.0 #14/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.0 #11/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26035 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.1 #15/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 28.7 #16/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17186 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.5 #16/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.8 #10/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22050 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 27.4 #17/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 36.3 #14/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15458 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 25.5 #18/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.6 #17/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6037 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.9 #19/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.1 #19/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26952 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 16.8 #20/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -4.4 #23/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24126 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.1 #21/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 8.7 #20/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20719 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.5 #22/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 5.9 #21/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13124 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 1.1 #23/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 0.9 #22/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23095 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -3.8 #24/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -10.7 #25/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10975 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -6.7 #25/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -11.9 #26/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28830 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -9.1 #26/26 avg 41.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -6.0 #24/26 avg 40.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |