| 16265 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 93.5 #1/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 93.6 #1/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10348 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 61.6 #2/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 59.6 #3/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7813 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.3 #3/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.1 #2/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21797 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 47.5 #4/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 48.1 #4/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28230 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.0 #5/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.7 #5/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19010 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.9 #6/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 39.6 #6/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23974 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.1 #7/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 29.8 #7/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21749 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.3 #8/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 26.3 #8/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24685 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.4 #9/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.4 #9/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27413 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.5 #10/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.5 #10/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15789 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.6 #11/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 1.8 #11/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12275 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -3.9 #12/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -7.2 #12/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21484 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -6.3 #13/13 avg 32.9 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -10.4 #13/13 avg 32.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |