| 19589 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 125.2 #1/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 124.3 #1/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22347 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 55.2 #2/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 43.0 #6/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8099 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 51.5 #3/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.1 #3/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7935 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 50.8 #4/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 53.7 #2/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 15010 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 48.2 #5/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.6 #4/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11990 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 45.2 #6/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.6 #7/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6128 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.8 #7/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.0 #5/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22334 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.3 #8/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 31.5 #10/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27366 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.9 #9/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 35.7 #9/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24291 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.8 #10/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.2 #8/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14822 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.9 #11/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.8 #18/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12005 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.4 #12/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.7 #13/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23383 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 22.0 #13/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 17.5 #17/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23801 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 21.6 #14/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.0 #20/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22271 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.0 #15/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.7 #11/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22356 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.6 #16/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 24.0 #12/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27603 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.0 #17/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.1 #14/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20654 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 18.6 #18/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.1 #16/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18215 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.6 #19/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.1 #15/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26165 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.5 #20/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.3 #19/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27059 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 14.2 #21/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.4 #24/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23795 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.7 #22/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 13.2 #21/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25984 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 10.7 #23/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 12.0 #22/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22333 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.1 #24/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 9.9 #23/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18249 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 0.9 #25/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -10.7 #26/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26021 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.7 #26/26 avg 28.7 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -7.6 #25/26 avg 28.1 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |