| 23511 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 134.8 #1/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 140.8 #1/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 9880 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 134.4 #2/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 126.8 #2/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8628 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 126.2 #3/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 118.6 #4/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7462 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 116.8 #4/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 121.5 #3/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 2939 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 111.4 #5/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 103.0 #5/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14179 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 85.7 #6/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 68.9 #11/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16965 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 84.4 #7/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.4 #10/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3805 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 74.0 #8/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.7 #9/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 25750 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 73.3 #9/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 79.6 #6/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 417 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 70.8 #10/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.8 #16/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24130 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 69.0 #11/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 73.9 #7/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19834 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 67.1 #12/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.3 #8/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4042 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 59.2 #13/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 57.4 #13/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6220 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.7 #14/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.1 #22/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16864 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.0 #15/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.9 #19/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10285 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.3 #16/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 58.1 #12/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21370 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 52.0 #17/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.5 #17/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 3231 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 40.5 #18/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 40.7 #20/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 28139 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 39.1 #19/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 45.9 #18/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23925 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.9 #20/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 50.7 #14/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24330 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.4 #21/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.5 #24/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21315 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.6 #22/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.1 #21/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21871 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 30.0 #23/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 49.8 #15/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7330 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 19.4 #24/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.6 #23/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27433 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.2 #25/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 8.2 #25/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27389 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -0.7 #26/26 avg 63.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 2.7 #26/26 avg 61.7 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |