Robolyst Robolyst

North Branch, MN, USA Since 2014

This page is unclaimed. Claim it to run your season on Robolyst: roster, tasks, budgets, and a website, free. Claim team #8636 →

Events
13
Career
66–55–1
Awards
15
1st place
5

Season profile

2025–2026 Decode
Compared against
Best score one match, not an average
61st percentile 185
#3,178 of 8,263
OPRc
86th percentile 55.4
#1,187 of 8,303
OPR
81st percentile 58.9
#1,557 of 8,303
Strength
87th percentile 57.6
#1,065 of 8,303
Consistency lower is better
35th percentile 18.0
#5,425 of 8,301
Total Luck
70th percentile · lucky +3.6
#2,479 of 8,303

Event by event

Strength margin of error
81.670.659.648.737.7Maple Grove Saturday Qualifier — Strength 53.7 ± 8.4Maple GroveNew Brighton Saturday Qualifier — Strength 47.5 ± 6.2New BrightonMinnesota FTC State Championship - Nano Division — Strength 71.5 ± 6.4Minnesota FTC

A line that climbs across the season is a robot that got better; a flat one with a wide band is a rating that hasn't been measured on enough matches to trust yet.

Maple Grove Saturday Qualifier Dec 6 USMNMGQ1

Best score 155 Q20
Strength 53.7 #4 of 21 here
Consistency 20.6 #19 of 21 here
Total Luck +3.6 fair
Where the points came from auto 12.0 teleop 45.2 OPRc 57.2

New Brighton Saturday Qualifier Dec 13 USMNNBQ1

Best score 129 P4
Strength 47.5 #3 of 22 here
Consistency 15.1 #14 of 22 here
Total Luck -1.3 fair
Where the points came from auto 13.9 teleop 31.1 OPRc 45.0

Minnesota FTC State Championship - Nano Division Feb 13 USMNCMPNANO

Best score 185 Q34
Strength 71.5 #12 of 28 here
Consistency 18.2 #8 of 28 here
Total Luck +8.5 fair
Where the points came from auto 21.0 teleop 43.1 OPRc 64.1

Each event's numbers are fit from that event's qualification matches; the season profile averages them across the events played. What every column means →