| 20153 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 161.8 #1/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 151.3 #1/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8393 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 132.2 #2/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 120.0 #3/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16468 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 112.9 #3/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 103.4 #5/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20152 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 104.9 #4/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 120.1 #2/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12792 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 101.4 #5/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 103.8 #4/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22312 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 89.2 #6/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 72.1 #9/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 13669 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 82.8 #7/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 74.4 #6/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18284 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 73.6 #8/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 72.8 #8/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 7423 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.2 #9/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 60.0 #11/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16564 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 69.5 #10/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 73.8 #7/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 8730 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 61.8 #11/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.8 #12/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16011 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 57.4 #12/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 63.6 #10/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12308 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.5 #13/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 34.2 #16/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21437 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 41.0 #14/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.0 #14/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22282 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 37.0 #15/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.1 #21/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14133 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.9 #16/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.2 #18/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20094 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 35.1 #17/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 46.4 #13/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10353 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 33.5 #18/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.5 #15/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11319 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.9 #19/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 27.9 #17/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22283 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 31.2 #20/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 20.1 #19/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11208 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 29.2 #21/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 19.0 #20/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22284 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.0 #22/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 8.1 #24/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5488 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 13.0 #23/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.6 #23/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 118 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.3 #24/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 15.6 #22/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22285 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 2.2 #25/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -6.3 #26/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16087 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -7.3 #26/26 avg 56.4 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -6.3 #25/26 avg 52.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |