| 18227 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 107.1 #1/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 100.5 #1/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 18270 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 53.2 #2/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 65.4 #2/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20313 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 42.7 #3/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.1 #3/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23716 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.1 #4/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 25.0 #5/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21330 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 36.0 #5/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.6 #4/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16802 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 24.2 #6/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.7 #6/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20040 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 20.8 #7/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.2 #12/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24095 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.6 #8/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 14.4 #7/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24799 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 9.3 #9/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 0.5 #11/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24092 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 7.0 #10/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 1.1 #10/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20039 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -1.8 #11/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 10.0 #8/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 19587 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -2.3 #12/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -5.5 #13/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24626 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -7.8 #13/13 avg 26.1 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 6.6 #9/13 avg 24.2 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |