| 5485 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 141.4 #1/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 132.8 #2/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 5356 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 136.2 #2/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 139.0 #1/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12833 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 112.8 #3/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 117.1 #3/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6454 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 84.5 #4/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 56.5 #10/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 23569 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 81.7 #5/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 69.2 #7/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10949 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 72.2 #6/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 67.2 #8/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 14281 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.7 #7/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 44.5 #13/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 17222 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 71.6 #8/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 88.4 #4/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 27239 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 64.4 #9/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 53.6 #12/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12414 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 63.6 #10/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 71.4 #5/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 16700 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 60.7 #11/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 70.8 #6/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 21428 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 56.9 #12/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 64.9 #9/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12915 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 49.3 #13/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 55.3 #11/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6347 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 44.2 #14/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 42.2 #14/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 24174 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 38.0 #15/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 22.3 #18/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 22277 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 32.7 #16/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 31.8 #17/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 26453 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 28.9 #17/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 37.9 #16/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 11607 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 23.1 #18/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 18.4 #20/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 12870 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.7 #19/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 38.9 #15/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10161 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 17.4 #20/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 4.9 #23/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 4809 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 15.6 #21/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 16.2 #21/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6945 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 12.3 #22/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -3.0 #25/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 6460 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 5.9 #23/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 21.0 #19/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20203 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 4.2 #24/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | 11.1 #22/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 10475 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | 1.6 #25/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -0.2 #24/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |
| 20228 | — OPRc Constrained offensive contribution from auto + teleop scoring (non-negative). | -3.6 #26/26 avg 50.2 OPR Offensive Power Rating: estimated points a team adds to its alliance score. | -10.6 #26/26 avg 48.5 Strength Schedule-adjusted quality: how strong this team looks accounting for who they faced. |